Jump to a section
Key takeaways
- Two referral entries can describe one prospective resident.
- A scheduled arrival and a completed admission establish different facts.
- A move-in count does not establish revenue, collections or lawful capacity.
Short answer
Ask what the move-in list actually records. It might combine inquiries, accepted reservations, referrals and completed admissions. A title such as expected census does not make those entries equivalent. The buyer needs to know who appears more than once, what happened and which dates the records cover.
The occupancy improvement comparison examines whether an owner should carry an improvement plan before selling. This answer focuses on a narrower buyer question: how much of a claimed admission pipeline is supported when records from several sources are combined near handoff.
Longer answer
Keep each export and note when its records end. A new referral export may repeat a person already entered through a direct inquiry. If the buyer adds both row counts without matching the records through an approved process, the total can grow even though no new person has asked about a place.
Define each status in plain terms. An inquiry means someone asked for information. A scheduled arrival is a plan. An actual move-in needs its own record. If the business uses a different definition, preserve it and explain the difference before comparing dates or sources.
The census and payer-mix guide separates activity, charges and collections. Use that distinction here as well. A move-in count does not prove a full month of charges. It also cannot show the amount earned under the relevant accounting method or the cash that will be received.
IRS recordkeeping guidance emphasizes underlying evidence for entries in the books, including invoices and receipts. A sales pipeline alone does not provide those records for delivered care. Have the accounting reviewer inspect the actual services, terms and transactions instead of assigning revenue from a prospect count. (Source: IRS supporting documents)
What it depends on
Check whether the list still reflects each person’s current plans. An old target date may remain in a system after a deferral or withdrawal. Record the status change and its source without inventing a reason. Keep open outcomes visible. Do not assign a chance of admission without a sound basis.
Also review the actual admission requirements. In Washington, an adult family home generally must obtain a written assessment of the prospective resident’s current needs and preferences before admission. The rule identifies a genuine-emergency exception to admission without an assessment. This is a scoped state rule, not a national admission schedule. (Source: WAC 388-76-10330)
A separate Washington AFH rule requires the home to meet assessed needs safely and appropriately with available staff and reasonable accommodation. Admission must also preserve its ability to meet other residents’ needs and safety and to evacuate everyone safely. A scheduled arrival cannot establish those conditions. (Source: WAC 388-76-10390)
The operator must assess the actual needs. An empty room does not resolve care, staffing or other operating questions. Use the occupancy definition to distinguish the count from the capacity measure, and avoid treating every vacancy as immediately available for any prospective resident.
Finally, maintain appropriate privacy controls during the matching work. The patient-records guide addresses the separate access review. A sale team needs sound findings. That need does not give it a right to share personal details about residents or prospects.
Example
Assume an invented handoff report lists four entries as planned move-ins. Its original exports have different cutoff dates. A later approved review establishes the following facts. The labels identify invented people and do not represent real care records or a de-identification method.
| Original entry | Relationship to other entries | Status at the review cutoff |
|---|---|---|
| Direct inquiry A | Same fictional person as referral A | Admission completed within the reviewed period |
| Referral A | Duplicate person from another channel | Same completed admission, not a second move-in |
| Direct inquiry B | Separate fictional person | Arrival deferred; no admission completed |
| Referral C | Separate fictional person | Plan withdrawn; no admission completed |
Four rows describe three unique prospects and one completed admission. Counting both A entries would double-count the same event. Adding B and C to the completed group would also misstate what happened. The report should preserve their different statuses rather than simply rename the four-row total.
This exercise does not calculate a conversion rate or recognize revenue. The records mix channels and outcomes, and the unresolved timing matters. Review the referral-concentration guide before drawing conclusions about a channel’s performance. Then connect the one completed admission to its actual service and accounting evidence.
What to do next
Create a dated worksheet that matches the original entries to each person, current status and completed move-in. Explain any matches still in doubt without forcing them into the total. Use the census definition to label the resulting activity measure consistently with the business’s own records.
Assign the remaining work through the residential care-home diligence guide. Carry confirmed admissions and open operating questions into the first-90-days plan. The buyer can then assess future demand separately from the services and revenue the evidence actually supports.
Frequently asked questions
Does a paid reservation prove that monthly care revenue is earned?
No. Identify the payment’s actual purpose, the agreement and applicable requirements. A deposit, reservation payment and charge for delivered services can raise different questions. Have the accounting reviewer determine the treatment rather than classifying every payment from a prospective resident as monthly care revenue.
Can I multiply each planned move-in by a full monthly fee?
That would hide assumptions about admission, dates, terms, services and collection. A scenario can make those assumptions explicit, but it is not a record of earned income. Test changes to timing and outcomes instead of presenting all scheduled arrivals as completed full-month revenue.
Does one successful admission prove that a referral channel converts well?
No. Define the unique prospect group, observation period and outcome before measuring conversion. Duplicate entries and unresolved prospects can distort the calculation. The example here reconciles a mixed status list; it does not establish a repeatable channel conversion rate or predict future admissions.
Can coded prospect records be shared freely with buyers?
No. Codes do not, by themselves, establish that real records may be disclosed. Review the purpose, recipients, remaining details and applicable privacy requirements. The fictional labels used here explain the exercise; they are not a method for making actual resident information safe to circulate.
Sources
Sources are dated to distinguish current guidance from earlier publications. They support the identified facts; the transaction questions and examples are educational analysis.
- Washington WAC 388-76-10330: adult family home resident assessment (2026 retrieval). Retrieved September 8, 2026.
- Washington WAC 388-76-10390: adult family home admission and continuing services (2026 retrieval). Retrieved September 8, 2026.
- IRS: What kind of records should I keep? (2026 retrieval). Retrieved September 5, 2026.